Why is mw3 so bad

It's not like the characters you play as are bloodthirsty maniacs with an iron will to kill. There is a good role model in this game named Captain John Price. He is the main protaganist in MW3 and is willing to give his life to end a war driven by a Russian madman. For kids who are mature enough to know what is going on in in the Armed Forces every day, Capt. Price may be a good role model for a mature kid.

They just don't know how this game is really like the horrors in the Middle East today. So yeah, there's violence in this game, but the "violence" is more like an act of valor rather than countlessly slaying people in truly terrible games that deserve an M rating like Grand Theft Auto.

Parents also say that blood squirts and splatters all around the area. The blood in MW3 does not fit this description at all. There is blood, but there is only one or two scenes where blood is excessive. These are in cinematic clips which can be skipped. Also, this whole time I've been talking about the campaign, which is where this game mostly gets its M rating. Now I'll talk about multiplayer content.

Ok, so multiplayer is the least violent part of this game. This is the part of the game that deserves a T rating, not an M. In this mode, the player is sent online to play against other players in numerous "maps".

This mode is not too violent as blood is minimal and can only really be seen in slo-mo which can be skipped. Also, there are barely any onscreen voices. Occasionally, a voice message created by the game will inform the player about things going on in the game.

But for a younger child, there could be older players with "ingame microphones" that can be taunting or rude to your child. The good thing is, if another player is taunting you, you can mute them so you will no longer hear messages from them.

One thing about multiplayer that if your child is new to the game, then more experienced players will destroy them in multiplayer. That can be frustrating and your kid might give up and it will be money down the drain if you buy it for them. So that's why I recommend that your kid practice the game before they try multiplayer so they will not be discouraged. So with the violence problem, my final verdict is that if your kid is 12 or over, they should be able to handle the violence in MW3.

Lots of parents say excessive foul language is also a problem for their kids. Well, there is a bit of language, but nothing worse than what your kid hears every day. No f-word in this game. So, after hearing the excessive violence and language problem from many parents on here, I think this review can shine a brighter light on this game for parents who think that MW3 is just a brutal, foul game that makes your kid kill hundreds of men in cold blood.

So parents, my final verdict about MW3 is that if your child has awareness of the world today, can handle a few deaths, knows to practice before diving into multiplayer, and knows to mute obnoxious players, and is 12 years or older, then MW3 is OK for your child.

Thank you for reading. This title contains: Positive role models. This review Helped me decide 1. Had useful details 1. Read my mind 3. Report this review. Kid, 10 years old February 21, Infinity Ward brings you nonstop action in the third installment of the Modern Warfare series and the 8th game in the Call of Duty franchise.

Not for kids? No way. I was playing Black Ops back when I was 8. This is nothing compared to how gory that game was. This game is easily okay for a year-old as long as they don't make fun of it.

There is a scene in the game that may be skipped where a girl dies but there is no gore or even a drop of blood, that character wasn't introduced to you so you won't feel sad, and you don't see her die being the gas from the gas attack blocks her!

This game has a multiplayer mode. If you are so concerned about a drop of blood from the story mode, then just play multiplayer. In the campaign, there is some smoking. This title contains: Positive Messages. Positive role models. Read my mind 1. Teen, 15 years old Written by Sealith January 12, An honest and detailed review from a player. Okay I know that most people aren't going to read this review because it's coming from a year-old, but if you've read this far keep reading.

Does BF4 still have players ? Does Battlefield 4 count players? Which battlefield has most players ? Is Battlefield 5 worth it ? Why is Battlefield 4 popular again? Do people still play Battlefield 1? Can you cross play Battlefield 4?

How can I get Battlefield 4 for free? Are BF4 expansion packs free? How long is BF4 free? Previous Article Is there a way to evade taxes legally? Next Article What are opening words? Back To Top. Go play a nice round of Mortal Kombat and allow someone to perform a fatality upon you.

If you think that COD's blood content is excessive, you need to delve more deeply into the world of video games. You're obviously too uptight if you have to refer to a site that reviews video games for your kids. Type in the game name, and "gameplay" afterwords.

In such a format. You'll see everything that you need to make a decision. And last but not least? You are running around, gunning random people, for the sake of simply gunning them down. Sounds bad right?

Your kid does not see it this way. Your kid sees it more-so as a puzzle. A challenge of sorts. Beating "one more level" or reaching the top of the scoreboard for a round. It's a pride issue, and it is bragging rights, if not for others, for themselves. I myself am 20 years old and, whether you find my information credible or not, is not my concern. Simply give it a glance over, and try to loosen up on the reigns a bit. Kids are going to be kids, and no matter WHAT you do, you cannot trap them.

If you won't buy it for them, they'll simply go to a friends house and play it, or they will find other outlets in which they may acquire time upon the game. A game is a game, and nothing more.

Should your kid go and shoot up a school because of it, has nothing to do with the game. That would simply be labeled as bad parenting. Helped me decide. Had useful details. Read my mind 2. Parent of a year-old Written by Logan P. November 26, There is only small shirts of blood and hell and damn are the 3 time used words.

Titanfall 2 is worse than it. There is NO sexual scenes and very few drugs and consumerism. Read my mind. Adult Written by Chavela O. September 29, Not as bad as you think, I watched my dad play this game when I was 4 years old and I started playing when I was 5 or 6. I love this game and I turned out fine. Yes, there is swearing and violence but that is a real thing. And war is real. If you try to hide it from your kids and act as if it isn't real, when they find out what it truly is, it will be much much worse.

Especially growing up in a Mexican and Puerto Rican household, this wasn't a concern for my parents and they let me play the game. Also, there is way more cussing in middle school and high school.

It isn't innovative, it isn't original, but it is ruthlessly compelling and packed with content. I am thoroughly enjoying it. Perhaps, however, we need to think about the critical criteria we use. Her colleague Daniel Krupa agrees. Once upon a time, blockbuster movies had critical merit too — the likes of Jaws and Star Wars, for example. But now you get these behemoths like Pirates of the Caribbean and Transformers and they are just explosion and spectacle.

Most people will defend them by saying it doesn't matter, they're just about fun. Maybe we're falling into that trap with Call of Duty. Perhaps we should expect more from our games.

I am curiously heartened by this. I've contributed toward the problem, of course, by awarding Modern Warfare five stars — a decision I stand by. But I am also a huge fan of indie and art games; I was transfixed by Robin Hunickie's explanation of thatgamecompany's beautifully strange Journey at GameCity just a week before I reviewed MW3.

I want new, innovative games too, and judging by the current flourishing of the indie games sector, there is a growing audience for offbeat, unorthodox experiences. It could be that gamers are undergoing a process of genre fatigue; it might be something to do with this console life cycle coming to an end. And although it's a pleasing game and critically it's great, it's solid, there's a feeling of disappointment that it's not more than we expected.

Someone will be looking to step into this space — it should have been Battlefield really, but someone is surely looking to please these people who are so fed up with Modern Warfare.

A vast, ambitious RPG that seeks to create an infinite number of quests, which will embrace every individual gamer. Is it sufficiently different from Elder Scrolls IV? Does that matter when ambition and scale are such a major part of the package? How do we approach that paradigm as reviewers? One thing there mustn't be is an irreparable disconnect between game journalists and game buyers. We should be in this together — if we're not communicating about games in the same way, something quietly terrible has happened.